LEIS LAW CLINIC is a cutting-edge Firm of seasoned legal practitioners, registered in Nigeria with the Corporate Affairs Commission on the 14th day of February, 2012.
The firm is built on a foundation of extensive legal knowledge, a profound understanding of our clients’ needs, and a steadfast dedication to achieving the best possible outcomes. With a harmonious blend of seasoned expertise and fresh perspectives, we tackle each case with a personalized approach, ensuring that every client receives the attention and bespoke service they deserve.
We don’t just practice law at LEIS LAW CLINIC; we redefine it.
With over 15 years of post-call experience, our Levi has mastered the art of navigating complex legal challenges while adapting to the changing dynamics of the legal landscape.
Levi is the Founder/Editor-In-Chief of LawCompass Electronic Reports (LCER)
Mr. Ikyuga was called to the Nigerian Bar in 2002 after obtaining his B.L. from the Nigerian Law School. He has been in active private legal practice all his post call years with a bias for general litigation, military law/Court Marshal, company law, property and constitutional/electoral law practice. Mr. Kyuga is a Senior Associate of the Firm from inception to date.
Mr. Audu obtained his LL.B. (Hons.) from University of Jos, Jos in 2008 and was called to the Nigerian Bar in 2009. He has rich post call experience in active private legal practice spanning over the years with specialization on commercial litigation/arbitration, telecom law, and insolvency practice. Before joining the Firm as an Associate Counsel, Mr. Audu had worked with Simon Yakubu Arabo & Co. (2009 – 2017).
Championing the rule of law, our constitutional specialists handle litigation, advise on legislative compliance, and protect fundamental rights and freedoms.
From corporate formation to complex mergers and acquisitions, our company law division ensures your business operates seamlessly within the legal framework.
We offer precise legal action in debt recovery through garnishee proceedings, ensuring that judgments are satisfied with due diligence and legal acumen.
LEIS LAW CLINIC is equipped to tackle a broad spectrum of legal disputes with a team of formidable litigators skilled in courtroom advocacy and conflict resolution.
Protecting your ideas and innovations, our IP attorneys offer robust protection, management, and enforcement of intellectual property rights in a global market.
Safeguarding sovereign rights and commercial interests, our expertise extends to maritime boundary delimitation, navigation freedoms, and the sustainable exploitation of marine resources.
From employment contracts to dispute resolution, our labour law experts advocate for fair workplace practices and protect employee and employer rights.
Protect your maritime ventures with our adept handling of marine insurance policies, claims resolution, and risk management.
Our property law connoisseurs manage real estate transactions, dispute resolution, and land use planning with meticulous care and legal expertise.
Secure your financial interests with our strategic legal solutions in perfecting security interests, enforcing creditor rights, and navigating insolvency issues.
“Levi Shaapera, Esq. is well known to me professionally as he appeared before my court in several cases. He is also of good character and has a sound knowledge of the law.”
“God has used you to restore food on my sister’s table and her whole family … Before she was restored, I was helping her in her financial needs … All that has stopped. May God continue to uplift you professionally, spiritually and family wise. Thanks a lot.
“Emeritus Professor of Law is what I want to put for you henceforth… because of how you deeply analyse things”
Levi I. Shaapera, Esq. Contempt and Contestation: The Ensured Right to Dispute Court Orders in DefianceLEIS LAW INSIGHT: WK17/D117/24 In the realm of contempt proceedings, a fundamentally recognised legal principle posits that any individual deemed in contempt of a court’s order is customarily prohibited from seeking remedial measures from the court so long as…
Levi I. Shaapera, Esq. Understanding the Burden of Proof in Seeking Declaratory ReliefLEIS LAW INSIGHT: WK17/D115/24 In the pursuit of declaratory relief within legal proceedings, it is imperative to acknowledge that the burden squarely lies on the party seeking such relief to establish their entitlement. The Insight: Declaratory relief is deemed an equitable remedy and…
Levi I. Shaapera, Esq. Addressing Verbosity and Inelegance in Grounds of AppealLEIS LAW INSIGHT: 365/116/24 The meticulous drafting of grounds of appeal and their particulars stands as a vital linchpin in ensuring the effectiveness of legal arguments presented before the court. However, it is not uncommon for respondents to express dissatisfaction with the verbosity, argumentativeness,…
The Claimant (our Client) commenced the Suit vide the Writ of summons issued on the 8th day of February, 2022 wherein he claims against the Federal University Dutsinma, inter alia: A DECLARATION that the purported termination of the Claimant’s appointment with the Defendant (that is FEDERAL UNIVERSITY, DUTSIN-MA) is unlawfully, malicious, null and void and of no legal effect;
The Claimant (our Client) commenced the Suit vide the Writ of summons issued on the 8th day of February, 2022 wherein he claims against the Federal University Dutsinma, inter alia: A DECLARATION that the purported termination of the Claimant’s appointment with the Defendant (that is FEDERAL UNIVERSITY, DUTSIN-MA) is unlawfully, malicious, null and void and of no legal effect;
The Claimant (our Client) commenced the Suit vide the Writ of summons issued on the 8th day of February, 2022 wherein he claims against the Federal University Dutsinma, inter alia: A DECLARATION that the purported termination of the Claimant’s appointment with the Defendant (that is FEDERAL UNIVERSITY, DUTSIN-MA) is unlawfully, malicious, null and void and of no legal effect;
The Claimant (our Client) commenced the Suit vide the Writ of summons issued on the 8th day of February, 2022 wherein he claims against the Federal University Dutsinma, inter alia: A DECLARATION that the purported termination of the Claimant’s appointment with the Defendant (that is FEDERAL UNIVERSITY, DUTSIN-MA) is unlawfully, malicious, null and void and of no legal effect;
The Claimant (our Client) commenced the Suit vide the Writ of summons issued on the 8th day of February, 2022 wherein he claims against the Federal University Dutsinma, inter alia: A DECLARATION that the purported termination of the Claimant’s appointment with the Defendant (that is FEDERAL UNIVERSITY, DUTSIN-MA) is unlawfully, malicious, null and void and of no legal effect;
The Claimant (our Client) commenced the Suit vide the Writ of summons issued on the 8th day of February, 2022 wherein he claims against the Federal University Dutsinma, inter alia: A DECLARATION that the purported termination of the Claimant’s appointment with the Defendant (that is FEDERAL UNIVERSITY, DUTSIN-MA) is unlawfully, malicious, null and void and of no legal effect;
The Claimant (our Client) commenced the Suit vide the Writ of summons issued on the 8th day of February, 2022 wherein he claims against the Federal University Dutsinma, inter alia: A DECLARATION that the purported termination of the Claimant’s appointment with the Defendant (that is FEDERAL UNIVERSITY, DUTSIN-MA) is unlawfully, malicious, null and void and of no legal effect;
